Sunday, December 31, 2017

Don't Let Him Shoot Me

“Tuskegee Institute, Alabama
                                             July 12, 1962

Reverend Martin Luther King
Atlanta, GA
Dear Friend and brother in Christ:
                 We read of you daily, today you are in Albany, GA. Standing trial, tomorrow I see you are to appear before a swanky Press Club, the first of the race so to do.
                 I confess that you are prayerfully on my mind almost continuously, as I think of you in prayer, asking the good, great spirit to preserve and keep that committed to His care.
                   May I share this with you in same connection:
I was hungry as I traveled home in Tennessee, going north on route 29. I went to a side street restaurant if it might be addressed so highly. A big strapping red man came to the door and stood across it – front door. I stood outside. I said, Mister, do you have a sandwich. He said what kind? I said it matters little, just a sandwich. While he was gone,  I thought, and as he came to the door, I still standing outside, I said to him, even without thinking of my words, as follows:

if you white folks don’t straighten up and fly right, God’s going to rain down fire from heaven and send you all to hell where you belong.” As I took the sandwich and marched back to my car, this prayer was on my lips and from my heart, “God, please do let him shoot me.”
                    I am asking God every day, Please God, don’t let any one shoot you.” Please.

                                               Yours and His ****************”

http://www.thekingcenter.org/archive/document/funny-story-mlk#

Photo ~ Harry Belafonte and Martin Luther King Jr

How to Love Politicians

"It is up to us whether we choose to get drawn in to the ad-hominem hostility that is the normal dialog of our time.

Maybe if we chose instead to dwell on love that we would truly change our society." -- Chris Robson

Last week, as I was putting together the last ‘Metta Letter’, I searched out a few different translations of the Dhammapada. One version that I particularly liked was by Ajahn Thanissaro. It starts:

Phenomena are   preceded by the heart,
ruled by the heart,
made of the heart.
If you speak or act
with a corrupted heart,
then suffering follows you —
as the wheel of the cart,
the track of the ox
that pulls it. 


Phenomena are  preceded by the heart,
ruled by the heart,
made of the heart.
If you speak or act
with a calm, bright heart,
then happiness follows you,
like a shadow
that never leaves.

I felt that this was exceptionally beautiful, and I liked the way the Ajahn chose to use ‘heart’ instead of the more common ‘mind’. In many ancient cultures the heart and mind are interchangeable, as the lump of flesh we call the heart was thought to be the seat of our consciousness.

Reading further, we have the following:

'He insulted me,
hit me,
beat me,
robbed me'
 — for those who brood on this,
hostility isn't stilled. 


'He insulted me,
hit me,
beat me,
robbed me' —
for those who don't brood on this,
hostility is stilled. 


Hostilities aren't stilled
through hostility,
regardless.
Hostilities are stilled
through non-hostility:
this, an unending truth. 


Unlike those who don't realize
that we're here on the verge
of perishing,
those who do:
their quarrels are stilled.

Reading this my mind (or heart) went to thinking about the current political dialog. There is so much ‘he said, she said’ going on at the moment. Yes, there are significantly differing views on very important issues, and some of these are being aired. However, much of what we hear and read is exactly the hostility this passage talks about.

Note that the Buddha doesn’t say “You’re wrong - he didn’t insult, hit or beat you.” Instead we are encouraged to not dwell (or brood) on our perceived hurt. It isn’t denying the reality of what happened, it is just saying that our choice is whether to brood on that, thus generating hostility.

In the same way, we may have real issues with some of what is being said by the politicians at the moment. We can - and should - continue to work for justice and the protection of the weak and disenfranchised in our society. But we can choose whether or not to turn that into hostility against those we dislike or disagree with.

When we practice Metta (Loving-kindness) meditations we practice loving all beings - people, creatures and politicians. It is up to us whether we choose to get drawn in to the ad-hominem hostility that is the normal dialog of our time.

Maybe if we chose instead to dwell on love that we would truly change our society."

Metta, Chris.

Metta Bhavana

Denise and I were introduced to metta by Chris Robson. http://www.camasmeditation.com/?m=1

"I have a love-hate relationship with the aphorism “happiness is a choice.” On the one hand, the saying has wonderful potential: it can speak to the power we could have (or already do have) to lift ourselves out of emotional quagmires. But on the other, it can completely dismiss the power that anger and pain can have over a person.  Repeating these words to a loved one when they are going through a difficult time can tell our loved one that we think their painful experiences are invalid, regardless of whether they think we might have meant well.


However, if we were to replace the word “happiness” with “kindness,” “love,” or even “anger,” the saying becomes less disposable. Happiness becomes important and relevant when we recognize its relationship to our actions and emotions.  Suddenly, wishing for someone to have happiness, or even to create it themselves, means something.


But we have to understand that happiness is not a component of a good life. It is the result of understanding, patience, and loving kindness.


The metta-bhavana is a meditation many of you may be familiar with. The basic framework is most accessibly (in my opinion) outlined in Chapter 9 of Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga (Pali: Path of Purification), dating back to the 5th century CE. The most well-known definition of “metta” is “loving kindness.” Another meaning, as Bhikkhu Bodhi translated, is “kind friendliness,” as “metta” derives from the Pali word for “friend.” “Bhavana” is usually translated as “meditation,” but it more literally means “cultivation” or “development.” During this process, loving kindness is meant to remove anger, hatred and delusion, and transform things which would normally trigger these emotions into opportunity for creative problem solving.


The metta-bhavana, while originally meant to be a deep work taken on early in the spiritual lives of Buddhist initiates, is now a practice shared by a world community. Many practices list 5 formal stages to this meditation, but as the Visuddhimagga discusses some thoughts and emotions that must be “reviewed” before beginning the practice, I think it is worth considering that review to be a stage in itself.


Before metta


To reference the immortal words of Kung Fu Panda’s Master Shifu: there is now a level zero. The Visuddhimagga teaches that one cannot simply jump into metta-bhavana without first acknowledging some common affective traps. Wrong thought, greed, and hatred are three cycles which can be escaped by cultivating metta. In Buddhist thought, these three qualities are referred to as “defilements of the mind.” (Gethin 1998, 80) However, in order to truly escape these cycles, it is necessary to do two things:


acknowledge their existence


work to understand their nature.


The dangers of hatred and anger can be countered by exercising patience and tolerance, both of which are necessary to begin understanding metta. (Visuddhimagga 9.1-3) Patience and tolerance are called “advantages,” and this is, from the standpoint of one seeking to cultivate self-discipline, a useful way to think of it. An advantage can be thought of as something that is more useful than another, or something that makes one’s labor (physical, intellectual, emotional, spiritual) easier, or something that is simply more powerful than something else. This is not to say that the defilements of the mind are not powerful: rather, acknowledging this dimension of power helps the practitioner recognize how easy it can be to succumb to hatred, anger, and delusion.


Or to put it more simply: how easy it can be to fail.


Unlike the next 5 stages, this stage doesn’t really have an affirmation (as such) linked to it. This does not mean that the Visuddhimagga dismisses this stage’s importance: rather, it advocates focusing on acknowledgement and understanding of the defilements’ role in our thinking. To attach an affirmation to this step, for Buddhaghosa, might have been either a little too revolutionary, or even a way to invite the defilements in. However, I see having an affirmation at this stage as being an opportunity to sit with difficult affect. Perhaps it might go something like this:


“I recognize. I understand.”


Toward oneself


The self is considered to be the easiest place, psychologically speaking, in which to start developing mettā. The Visuddhimagga specifically warns against starting anywhere else but with oneself, as starting elsewhere can awaken strenuous emotions: such as fatigue (if trying to cultivate any kind of feeling toward a neutral party), sadness (if a loved one stumbles in life), and anger (in the case of one’s enemy). These things serve no purpose but to build walls between the practitioner and their goal. If one does not have a base of metta upon which to build, their efforts will not last. (Visuddhimagga 9.3-7)


The Anguttara Nikaya teaches that this inward direction does not mean that developing metta within oneself acknowledges a “self,” per se: rather that, only by building one’s inner intention can one radiate it outward. (Sheth 2006, 817)  Further, Buddhaghosa reminds his students of an affirmation in the Metta Sutta, which reads: "in gladness and in safety, may all beings be at ease." (Visuddhimagga 9.9) “All beings” includes the self, and this is perhaps the most difficult part of this meditation.


The affirmation for this stage (Visuddhimagga 9.8) can be interpreted in a number of ways, but the essence is: “May I be happy and free from suffering.”


Toward our loved ones


The next stage of the metta-bhavana focuses on a person close to us, whom we love and respect. After we are able to develop loving kindness within and for ourselves, it becomes easier to focus on someone close to us, and not despair when something bad befalls them or when they become angry when they are wronged (either by another person or by ourselves). During this stage, the practitioner focuses on recalling the qualities, kind words, etc., which inspire feelings and thoughts of affection. (Visuddhimagga 9.11) By expanding our metta to a loved one, the practice of patience and tolerance moves outside our own minds, and begins to have a real effect on the world. This stage is where the practitioner begins to understand the universe’s true nature: as an interdependent wholeness which, while made of many, is one.


“May my loved ones be happy and free from suffering.”


Toward neutral beings


At this stage, the development of metta begins to compound exponentially. Now that one has an understanding of the nature and power of the defilements, metta inside and for oneself, and metta for loved ones, it is time to use what one has learned about the mutable, moldable nature of consciousness to expand one’s “mettaspheres.” Not only does the practitioner expand their meditation to include people for whom we don’t feel particular affection or enmity for, but they further expand the metta cultivated for the self to their loved ones. (Visuddhimagga 9.12)  So not only do we have lovingkindness for our loved ones as loved ones, but as ourselves.


This is the stage wherein the metta we first had for loved ones extends to people we are indifferent to (or possibly for whom we actively cultivate indifference?). While not as easy to do as the last two stages, it is still simpler to accomplish this goal than it is with those we regard with hostility, simply because there is little to no affective attachment. Thinking of a neutral person does not trigger us in the way that thinking of loved ones or those who have harmed us can.


“May those around me be happy and free from suffering.”


Toward those with whom we are in conflict


This is the most difficult stage of the metta-bhavana. The Visuddhimagga dedicates more space to discussing this sphere of human relationship than any other as far as cultivating metta is concerned. So much, in fact, that there are mini-stages within this stage. Getting rid of resentment is a necessary part of cultivating metta either for a person for whom we have antipathy, or an enemy. (Note: the Visuddhimagga hints that there is a difference between these two, and it also recognizes the possibility that a person may have no enemies. For the purposes of the metta-bhavana, there is no functional difference between actuallyhaving no enemies, and truly/selflessly regarding oneself as having no enemies.)


Banishing resentment is a complex process. There are some thoughts that must be overcome first. Among these are the tendency to delight at an enemy’s failure, abiding anger when thinking about ways this person has wronged you, actively wishing misfortune on the person, and being jealous or angry when recognizing an enemy’s beauty. (Visuddhimagga 9.14-15) If releasing these is not enough to eliminate resentment, the practitioner remembers something good about that person, specifically something that causes good feelings. To hold this image in one’s mind makes it easier to control one’s thoughts, words, and actions toward that person. (Visuddhimagga 9.16-19)


When all of that fails, it is time for the practitioner to essentially induce compassion (karuna). The Vishuddhimagga suggests a bit of an extreme affirmation if this is needed: “Though he is going about in the human world now, nevertheless after a certain number of days he will find himself in [one of] the eight great hells or the sixteen prominent hells." (Visuddhimagga, 9.20: see Nyànamoli tr. The Path of Purification 3rd edition (Buddhist Publication Society 2011), 295.)    This thought is essentially a way to shock the practitioner into a state of pity for their enemy, and by doing so, let their resentment go.


The Vishuddhimagga goes on to list many more things that must be done if this third method does not work, including recognizing one’s own responsibility for their feelings, all the way to giving a significant gift to the person to try and obtain karmic merit to make up for some that was lost in the process. (Vishuddhimagga 9.21-40) But no matter how long it takes, eventually the metta-bhavana for a hostile person will transform into that for a neutral person. Then a loved one, and eventually, to that of oneself.


“May my enemies be happy and free from suffering.”


“May those I once knew be happy and free from suffering.”


Toward all sentient beings


The ultimate goal of the metta-bhavana is to embrace all sentient beings within the radiant metta cultivated through their practice. This includes human beings whom we have not met, potential life in the rest of the universe, and even some non-human life on Earth. Even though numerous Buddhist sources define a sentient being as a being which has cognitive faculties and the potential to reason, the meaning of “sentience,” and what it applies to, is still evolving. To wit, some Tibetan teachers have questioned at what point artificial intelligences will be considered sentient.


Further, one has to consider the possibility that not all sentience is human. The 2014 case of Tommy the chimpanzee in Fulton County, New York (which was recently reopened) questioned the personhood of non-human primates. Cases such as these may create an even greater intellectual responsibility for the metta-bhavana practitioner, and further widen the final mettasphere. But even entertaining the possibility may yet be enough to complete one’s journey to conquering the defilements of the mind and exercising loving kindness for all.


“May all beings be happy and free from suffering.”
 


WORKS CITED


Bhikku Nyànamoli tr. The Path of Purification, 3rd edition. Buddhist Publication Society, 2011."


Noel Sheth. 2006. "Christian and Buddhist Altruistic Love." Gregorian Biblical Press 87, No. 4 (2006), 810-826. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23581627


Rupert Gethin. The Foundations of Buddhism (London: Cambridge University Press, 1998).


Keep Weird

"Don't become a spiritual zombie, devoid of passion and deep human feeling.

Let spirituality become a celebration of your uniqueness rather than a repression of it! Never lose your quirkiness, your strangeness, your weirdness - your unique and irreplaceable flavour. Don't try or pretend to be 'no-one' or 'nothing' or some transcendent impersonal non-entity - that's just another conceptual fixation and nobody's buying it any more. We've woken up from the nondual trance.

Be a celebration of what your unique human expression is and stop apologising. Fall in love with this perfectly divine, very human mess that you are. There is no authority here, and no way to get life wrong.

So get it all wrong. And feel so right."

- Jeff Foster

Pure Presence of God

"All beings are bitten by the serpent of ignorance.
But when ignorance combines with arrogance,
then we are really in a very bad state.
You have to come out of arrogance.
When arrogance goes, humility comes.
When humility comes, ignorance also will go.
When ignorance and arrogance are no more,
Grace will be recognised and experienced
as the pure presence of God."

~ Mooji

White Fire #141

Photo: Lucy, 5, of Lenox, Mass. sleds down the hill at Monument Mountain High School in Great Barrington, Mass. where families joined to go sledding on the day after Christmas, Dec. 26, 2017. (Gillian Jones/The Berkshire Eagle via AP)

Time To Go To Work

"You wanna fly, you got to give up the shit that weighs you down." - Toni Morrison

There's a season for everything -a season for sitting still & a season for rising up.

'Passive resistance'? I for one have never advocated for passive anything! ;)
- Gandhi

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. - MLK jr

"I am staring out of the window in an extremely dark mood, feeling helpless. Then a friend, a fellow artist, calls to wish me happy holidays. He asks, “How are you?” And instead of “Oh, fine—and you?”, I blurt out the truth: “Not well. Not only am I depressed, I can’t seem to work, to write; it’s as though I am paralyzed, unable to write anything more in the novel I’ve begun. I’ve never felt this way before, but the election….” I am about to explain with further detail when he interrupts, shouting: “No! No, no, no! This is precisely the time when artists go to work—not when everything is fine, but in times of dread. That’s our job!”

I felt foolish the rest of the morning, especially when I recalled the artists who had done their work in gulags, prison cells, hospital beds; who did their work while hounded, exiled, reviled, pilloried. And those who were executed...

The list—which covers centuries, not just the last one—is long. A short sample will include Paul Robeson, Primo Levi, Ai Weiwei, Oscar Wilde, Pablo Picasso, Dashiell Hammett, Wole Soyinka, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Lillian Hellman, Salman Rushdie, Herta Müller, Walter Benjamin. An exhaustive list would run into the hundreds...

We must know, at some level of consciousness, that the source of and reason for our instilled aggression is not only fear. It is also money... Our debates, for the most part, are examples unworthy of a playground...

I remember the shout of my friend that day after Christmas: No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.

I know the world is bruised and bleeding, and though it is important not to ignore its pain, it is also critical to refuse to succumb to its malevolence. Like failure, chaos contains information that can lead to knowledge—even wisdom. Like art."

-- Toni Morrison

Spreading Light

There are two ways of spreading light:
to be the candle or the mirror that reflects it. ~ Edith Wharton

"Set wide the window. Let me drink the day.
I loved light ever, light in eye and brain—
No tapers mirrored in long palace floors,
Nor dedicated depths of silent aisles,
But just the common dusty wind-blown day
That roofs earth’s millions.

O, too long I walked
In that thrice-sifted air that princes breathe,
Nor felt the heaven-wide jostling of the winds
And all the ancient outlawry of earth!
Now let me breathe and see.

This pilgrimage
They call a penance—let them call it that!
I set my face to the East to shrive my soul
Of mortal sin? So be it. If my blade
Once questioned living flesh, if once I tore
The pages of the Book in opening it,
See what the torn page yielded ere the light
Had paled its buried characters—and judge!

The girl they brought me, pinioned hand and foot
In catalepsy—say I should have known
That trance had not yet darkened into death,
And held my scalpel. Well, suppose I knew?
Sum up the facts—her life against her death.
Her life? The scum upon the pools of pleasure
Breeds such by thousands. And her death? Perchance
The obolus to appease the ferrying Shade,
And waft her into immortality.
Think what she purchased with that one heart-flutter
That whispered its deep secret to my blade!
For, just because her bosom fluttered still,
It told me more than many rifled graves;
Because I spoke too soon, she answered me,
Her vain life ripened to this bud of death
As the whole plant is forced into one flower,
All her blank past a scroll on which God wrote
His word of healing—so that the poor flesh,
Which spread death living, died to purchase life!

Ah, no! The sin I sinned was mine, not theirs.
Not that they sent me forth to wash away—
None of their tariffed frailties, but a deed
So far beyond their grasp of good or ill
That, set to weigh it in the Church’s balance,
Scarce would they know which scale to cast it in.
But I, I know. I sinned against my will,
Myself, my soul—the God within the breast:
Can any penance wash such sacrilege?

When I was young in Venice, years ago,
I walked the hospice with a Spanish monk,
A solitary cloistered in high thoughts,
The great Loyola, whom I reckoned then
A mere refurbisher of faded creeds,
Expert to edge anew the arms of faith,
As who should say, a Galenist, resolved
To hold the walls of dogma against fact,
Experience, insight, his own self, if need be!
Ah, how I pitied him, mine own eyes set
Straight in the level beams of Truth, who groped
In error’s old deserted catacombs
And lit his tapers upon empty graves!
Ay, but he held his own, the monk—more man
Than any laurelled cripple of the wars,
Charles’s spent shafts; for what he willed he willed,
As those do that forerun the wheels of fate,
Not take their dust—that force the virgin hours,
Hew life into the likeness of themselves
And wrest the stars from their concurrences.
So firm his mould; but mine the ductile soul
That wears the livery of circumstance
And hangs obsequious on its suzerain’s eye.
For who rules now? The twilight-flitting monk,
Or I, that took the morning like an Alp?
He held his own, I let mine slip from me,
The birthright that no sovereign can restore;
And so ironic Time beholds us now
Master and slave—he lord of half the earth,
I ousted from my narrow heritage.

For there’s the sting! My kingdom knows me not.
Reach me that folio—my usurper’s title!
Fallopius reigning, vice—nay, not so:
Successor, not usurper. I am dead.
My throne stood empty; he was heir to it.
Ay, but who hewed his kingdom from the waste,
Cleared, inch by inch, the acres for his sowing,
Won back for man that ancient fief o’ the Church,
His body? Who flung Galen from his seat,
And founded the great dynasty of truth
In error’s central kingdom?

Ask men that,
And see their answer: just a wondering stare
To learn things were not always as they are—
The very fight forgotten with the fighter;
Already grows the moss upon my grave!
Ay, and so meet—hold fast to that, Vesalius.
They only, who re-conquer day by day
The inch of ground they camped on over-night,
Have right of foothold on this crowded earth.
I left mine own; he seized it; with it went
My name, my fame, my very self, it seems,
Till I am but the symbol of a man,
The sign-board creaking o’er an empty inn.
He names me—true! Oh, give the door its due
I entered by. Only, I pray you, note,
Had door been none, a shoulder-thrust of mine
Had breached the crazy wall”—he seems to say.
So meet—and yet a word of thanks, of praise,
Of recognition that the clue was found,
Seized, followed, clung to, by some hand now dust—
Had this obscured his quartering of my shield?

How the one weakness stirs again! I thought
I had done with that old thirst for gratitude
That lured me to the desert years ago.
I did my work—and was not that enough?
No; but because the idlers sneered and shrugged,
The envious whispered, the traducers lied,
And friendship doubted where it should have cheered
I flung aside the unfinished task, sought praise
Outside my soul’s esteem, and learned too late
That victory, like God’s kingdom, is within.
(Nay, let the folio rest upon my knee.
I do not feel its weight.) Ingratitude?
The hurrying traveller does not ask the name
Of him who points him on his way; and this
Fallopius sits in the mid-heart of me,
Because he keeps his eye upon the goal,
Cuts a straight furrow to the end in view,
Cares not who oped the fountain by the way,
But drinks to draw fresh courage for his journey.
That was the lesson that Ignatius taught—
The one I might have learned from him, but would not—
That we are but stray atoms on the wind,
A dancing transiency of summer eves,
Till we become one with our purpose, merged
In that vast effort of the race which makes
Mortality immortal.

“He that loseth
His life shall find it”: so the Scripture runs.
But I so hugged the fleeting self in me,
So loved the lovely perishable hours,
So kissed myself to death upon their lips,
That on one pyre we perished in the end—
A grimmer bonfire than the Church e’er lit!
Yet all was well—or seemed so—till I heard
That younger voice, an echo of my own,
And, like a wanderer turning to his home,
Who finds another on the hearth, and learns,
Half-dazed, that other is his actual self
In name and claim, as the whole parish swears,
So strangely, suddenly, stood dispossessed
Of that same self I had sold all to keep,
A baffled ghost that none would see or hear!
“Vesalius? Who’s Vesalius? This Fallopius
It is who dragged the Galen-idol down,
Who rent the veil of flesh and forced a way
Into the secret fortalice of life”—
Yet it was I that bore the brunt of it!

Well, better so! Better awake and live
My last brief moment as the man I was,
Than lapse from life’s long lethargy to death
Without one conscious interval. At least
I repossess my past, am once again
No courtier med’cining the whims of kings
In muffled palace-chambers, but the free
Friendless Vesalius, with his back to the wall
And all the world against him. O, for that
Best gift of all, Fallopius, take my thanks—
That, and much more. At first, when Padua wrote:
“Master, Fallopius dead, resume again
The chair even he could not completely fill,
And see what usury age shall take of youth
In honours forfeited”—why, just at first,
I was quite simply credulously glad
To think the old life stood ajar for me,
Like a fond woman’s unforgetting heart.
But now that death waylays me—now I know
This isle is the circumference of my days,
And I shall die here in a little while—
So also best, Fallopius!

For I see
The gods may give anew, but not restore;
And though I think that, in my chair again,
I might have argued my supplanters wrong
In this or that—this Cesalpinus, say,
With all his hot-foot blundering in the dark,
Fabricius, with his over-cautious clutch
On Galen (systole and diastole
Of Truth’s mysterious heart!)—yet, other ways,
It may be that this dying serves the cause.
For Truth stays not to build her monument
For this or that co-operating hand,
But props it with her servants’ failures—nay,
Cements its courses with their blood and brains,
A living substance that shall clinch her walls
Against the assaults of time. Already, see,
Her scaffold rises on my hidden toil,
I but the accepted premiss whence must spring
The airy structure of her argument;
Nor could the bricks it rests on serve to build
The crowning finials. I abide her law:
A different substance for a different end—
Content to know I hold the building up;
Though men, agape at dome and pinnacles,
Guess not, the whole must crumble like a dream
But for that buried labour underneath.
Yet, Padua, I had still my word to say!
Let others say it!—Ah, but will they guess
Just the one word—? Nay, Truth is many-tongued.
What one man failed to speak, another finds
Another word for. May not all converge
In some vast utterance, of which you and I,
Fallopius, were but halting syllables?
So knowledge come, no matter how it comes!
No matter whence the light falls, so it fall!
Truth’s way, not mine—that I, whose service failed
In action, yet may make amends in praise.
Fabricius, Cesalpinus, say your word,
Not yours, or mine, but Truth’s, as you receive it!
You miss a point I saw? See others, then!
Misread my meaning? Yet expound your own!
Obscure one space I cleared? The sky is wide,
And you may yet uncover other stars.
For thus I read the meaning of this end:
There are two ways of spreading light: to be
The candle or the mirror that reflects it.
I let my wick burn out—there yet remains
To spread an answering surface to the flame
That others kindle.

Turn me in my bed.
The window darkens as the hours swing round;
But yonder, look the other casement glows!
Let me face westward as my sun goes down."

~ Edith Wharton, Vesalius In Zante