Sunday, January 28, 2018

Surprised by Joy

"Obviously a prodigy, Joy (Davidman) manifested unusual critical and analytical skills, as well as musical talent. Raised in a middle class Bronx neighborhood, Joy Davidman even amazed her brilliant and demanding father by being able to read a score of Chopin and then play it on the piano without another glance at the score. Similarly she would take her part in a Shakespeare play and memorize her lines after the first reading. Howard Davidman, Joy's brother and her junior by four years, recalled that her striking intellectual powers and aggressive personality elicited his devoted admiration but at the same time inhibited him...






Always the radical with somewhat of an obsessive personality, Joy Davidman, like many intellectuals in the 1930s and 1940s, proclaimed herself disillusioned with capitalism and the "American system." Joy flirted with Communism during these tumultuous years. And while she never came close to becoming a doctrinaire Marxist, she did advocate socialism over capitalism, especially since the latter system, to her mind, had failed and caused the Great Depression. Joy actually joined the Communist Party but found the meetings and most of the members quite boring. If she never advocated or expected the overthrow of capitalism, she did indeed enjoy criticizing both Democrats and Republicans who she believed were less enlightened than the supposedly heroic socialists who led the U.S.S.R.


Ultimately Joy Davidman was too intelligent to buy into the romanticized notions of the USSR circulating among the American intelligentsia during the 1930s and early 1940s. Indeed, the only things Joy got out of her brief affair with Communism was part-time employment as a film critic and book reviewer and poetry editor for New Masses, a Communist newspaper, plus an acquaintance with another left-wing writer who would become her husband and the father of their two bright and healthy boys.


As early as 1942 twenty-seven year old Joy Davidman observed that the Communist Party in America had only one valid reason for being, "it is a great matchmaker." In August that year, Joy married William Lindsay Gresham, novelist, journalist, Spanish Civil War veteran, charming story teller, and sometime guitar player and vocalist in Greenwich Village drinking establishments. Bill had grown disillusioned with Communists and their lofty speeches during his time in Spain. His dim view of the leftist movement hurried Joy out of the Party especially when she gave birth to David in early 1944, and Douglas less than a year and a half later.


By her own admission, Joy Davidman Gresham had been searching for fulfillment for years. College and graduate school, writing and editing, and socializing with some of New York's most celebrated editors and authors, as well as political activism, were good in their place, but she was empty inside. With highest expectations she entered into family life with her husband. While Bill Gresham wrote and sold novels, including one (Nightmare Alley) that became a motion picture starring Tyrone Power, Joy stayed at home, did some freelance writing, and cared for her little boys, and the house and garden.


The Gresham marriage was in trouble from the outset. Bill had a serious drinking problem. Binges and hangovers cut into his writing - just when the growing family required more time and money. Bill not only wasted time and earned little money, he embarked upon a series of extra-marital affairs that at once broke Joy's heart and drove her to fits of anger and despair. To make matters worse, she had few friends and absolutely no religion to turn to for strength.






C.S. Lewis once remarked that "every story of conversion is a story of blessed defeat." By the end of 1945 large cracks began to appear in her protective armor. Better educated and more intelligent than most people, well published and highly respected for a person only thirty years old, Joy had seldom if ever seriously entertained weakness or failure. But Bill's long absences from home and apparent lack of concern for her and the boys left her devastated. One night in spring 1946 Bill called from Manhattan and announced he was having a nervous breakdown. Whether true or just another cover story for one of his escapades is beside the point. In brief, he was not coming home and could not promise when or if ever he would be back. Bill then rang off and Joy walked into the nursery where her babies slept. In her words, she was all alone with her fears and the quiet. She recalled later that "for the first time my pride was forced to admit that I was not, after all, 'the master of my fate'. . . . All my defenses - all the walls of arrogance and cocksureness and self-love behind which I had hid from God - went down momentarily - and God came in." She went on to describe her perception of the mystical encounter this way:

It is infinite, unique; there are no words, there are no comparisons. . . .Those who have known God will understand me. . . . There was a Person with me in that room, directly present to my consciousness - a Person so real that all my previous life was by comparison a mere shadow play. And I myself was more alive than I had ever been; it was like waking from sleep. So intense a life cannot be endured long by flesh and blood; we must ordinarily take our life watered down, diluted as it were, by time and space and matter. My perception of God lasted perhaps half a minute.


Joy concluded that inasmuch as God apparently exists, then there is nothing more important than learning who He is and what He requires of us. Consequently the former atheist embarked upon a journey to know more of God. At the outset she explored Reformed Judaism but could find no inner peace. Always the reader, she devoured books and verse on spirituality, including Francis Thompson's long poem "The Hound of Heaven." It was first Thompson's poetry and then three books by C.S. Lewis - The Great Divorce, Miracles, and The Screwtape Letters - that caused her to read the Bible. And when she got into the Gospels, according to her testimony, the One who had come to her appeared again: "He was Jesus."


Joy Davidman found nourishing spiritual food in the Bible and the writings of C.S. Lewis. Because of her interest in Lewis, the publications of a liberal arts college professor and poet, Chad Walsh, who also happened to be a mid-life convert, caught her attention. Walsh wrote a biographical article on C.S. Lewis for the New York Times in 1948, and he published the first biography of Mr. Lewis a few months later entitled C.S. Lewis: Apostle to the Skeptics. Joy corresponded with Chad Walsh about her many questions related to Lewis's books and her new-found faith. Walsh understood and respected Joy's pilgrimage so he and his wife, Eva, frequently entertained Joy and her boys at their summer cottage at Lake Iroquois, Vermont...


At Chad Walsh's urging, Joy wrote to C.S. Lewis about some of her thoughts on his books. Although Walsh assured Joy that Lewis always answered his correspondence, it took her two years to find the courage to write. When she did, in January 1950, Lewis's brother noted in his journal that Jack had received a fascinating letter from a most interesting American woman, Mrs. Gresham.
For the next two and a half years Joy and C.S. Lewis carried on a rich correspondence that intellectually and spiritually encouraged each of them. Over that quarter decade Joy's health and family problems opened the way for the famous English author and his talented American pen friend to meet.


During the late 1940s Joy's health deteriorated. She suffered from nervous exhaustion while trying to raise the boys and write enough to pay all the bills. To be sure, Bill Gresham sobered up for brief periods, and he was in and out of the house depending on his moods.

Joy finished several writing projects, including a novel. Then while writing a book-length Jewish-Christian interpretation of the Ten Commandments, she became gravely ill with jaundice. Her doctor ordered rest - preferably away from the the pressures of her chaotic house and family. In the midst of this turmoil Joy received a cry for help from her first cousin, Renée Pierce. Renée had two little children, and an alcoholic husband, and a desperate need to live apart from her estranged spouse until a divorce could be finalized. With no money and few alternatives, she threw herself on the Greshams for mercy. Joy took her in and after a few months Renée enthusiastically agreed to oversee the household so Joy could get away for a rest.


With financial help from her parents, Joy sailed for England in August, 1950. She found a room in London, rested well, and put the finishing touches on Smoke on the Mountain: An Interpretation of the Ten Commandments. While in London for four months the Lewis brothers invited Joy to Oxford. Indeed, there were several visits where Joy Gresham and Jack Lewis had opportunity to get better acquainted. Joy laid out her problems before Jack Lewis. He listened, grieved for her, and said a sad farewell when she returned to New York in January 1951.


During the four months Joy resided in London, Bill wrote from time to time keeping her informed about the boys. Just before her return, however, he announced that he and Renée were in love and having an affair. He wondered if Joy would consider living under the same roof despite the changed circumstances. Joy had no intention of doing that but she did return with some hope that the mess could be redeemed.


Months of wrangling failed to bring reconciliation. Nine months later Bill sued Joy for a divorce on grounds of her desertion when she went to England. In the meantime C.S. Lewis and his brother, Warrren, both of whom had grown extremely fond of Joy - urged her to return to England and bring the boys. She was back in England with David and Douglas before Christmas.


Joy lived in London for nearly two years, trying to support herself by free-lance typing and writing in order to supplement Bill's erratic child-support checks. The boys were placed in private schools thanks to the generosity of C.S. Lewis. For almost two years Joy and Jack visited one another regularly. When Joy's financial situation worsened in August 1955, Lewis secured a place for her in Oxford, not far from his own home. He paid the rent and he and Warren plied her with manuscripts to edit and type.


By Christmas 1955 it was apparent to everyone who knew them that friendship had become love. Lewis visited Joy almost daily and she and the boys spent holidays, and special occasions with Warren and Jack at their home, The Kilns. Because Joy was now a divorced woman, there was no impropriety - at least to their mind - for them to see one another on a regular basis. But Joy told her closest friends that although they frequently walked and held hands, marriage was out of the question. Because she was divorced even their friendship appeared scandalous to some people.


In April 1956 the British Govern ment, perhaps because of Joy Davidman's previous Communist Party affiliation, refused to renew her visa. C.S. Lewis was devastated. How could this woman be sent back to the United States where her boys would possibly be abused by their alcoholic father who had more than once done them physical harm? And how could he manage without Joy nearby? She, after all, was the first woman with whom he had been truly close. She was his equal if not superior in intellect and they were the epitome of two people who truly were like iron sharpening iron,
In fact, C.S. Lewis could not imagine living apart from Joy Davidman. He threw caution and appearances to the wind. They quietly married in a civil ceremony on April 23, 1956. Now Joy could legally remain in England, with her boys, as long as she wished.








C.S. Lewis inquired about a sacramental marriage in the Anglican Church because to his mind a civil marriage was a legal convenience but not a real marriage. Lewis sought the blessing of the church on the grounds that Joy had legal grounds to be divorced and remarried due to Bill's infidelity, and further because he had been married prior to marrying Joy, and also neither of them were Christians when they were joined in a civil service years before. But the Bishop of Oxford refused. Joy was divorced. The Church did not condone divorce and he would not give his blessing.


Joy and Jack lived apart but they continued to see one another. So much so that some people were critical of their relationship despite the fact that they honored the guidance of the Church. But everything changed in early 1957. Joy was standing in her kitchen, her leg broke, and with excruciating pain she was able to drag herself to a place to call for help. She was rushed to the hospital where x-rays and tests revealed that her body was full of cancer. C.S. Lewis's doctor, who tended to her at the hospital, told me in the 1980s that she was dreadfully ill. There were malignant tumors in her breast and her bones were riddled with cancer. Dr. Humphrey Havard told Jack to prepare for her death. She could not live but a few days or weeks.


Professor Lewis called in a favor from a man he had helped after the war. Father Peter Bide, an Anglican priest with a parish just south of London, was purported to have the spiritual gift of healing. Lewis called him and asked if he would come up to Oxford, anoint Joy with oil, and pray for her. Father Bide arrived at Oxford at night. He and Jack talked about Joy's situation at some length, and Lewis told him of Joy's dying wish to be married in the Church. Father Bide recalled that he did not feel he could in good conscience deny this poor soul her wish, even though she was not in his diocese. Therefore the next day, March 21, 1957, he anointed her with oil, prayed for healing, and then in the presence of Warren Lewis and one of the sisters at the hospital, he administered the sacraments of Holy Matrimony and Holy Communion. Within a few minutes an apparently dying Joy Davidman became Mrs. C.S. Lewis.


Christian marriage was only the first unexpected effect of Joy's illness. To the amazement of doctors and nurses, she made a rapid recovery after being sent home from the hospital to die. She went into a remission of nearly three years. She and Jack traveled to Ireland and Wales, and they made a memorable trip to Greece with their friends, June and Roger Lancelyn Green. The Lewises' closest friends, the Greens and George and Moira Sayers - all said that Joy showed no signs of poor health except some edema. Indeed, Joy and Jack were like two school-aged youth who were cutting up and having a wonderful time. That Joy had brought great happiness to Jack became evident by what he wrote to one friend: "It's funny having at 59 the sort of happiness most men have in their twenties. . . [ellipses his] - Thou has kept the good wine till now."






The relationship of C.S. Lewis and Joy lasted only a decade. She first wrote to Jack in January 1950, and the cancer returned with a vengeance in spring 1960. Joy died in July and her ashes (she requested cremation) were scattered over a rose garden at the crematorium. Although it is impossible to quantify the impact of any loving relationship, there is massive evidence to show that these two pilgrims were unusually important to one another. On Jack's part, his early books had helped Joy come to faith in Christ. His letters and their personal relationship helped her mature spiritually in Christ, and he helped her to develop professionally as a writer. Lewis helped Joy sharpen Smoke on the Mountain. He also wrote a Foreword for the British edition, helped promote the book and intervened to secure her a good contract with a British publisher. On her part, Joy had an impact on C.S. Lewis that has seldom been recognized. Lewis admitted that when she and the boys came into his life it was extremely difficult for an aging bachelor to have an instant family in his house. But the result was that both he and Warren were forced outside of themselves and this was precisely what these self-centered bachelors needed. Beyond such intangible benefits, Joy helped Lewis with his writing. She wrote to one person that she increasingly felt called to give up her own writing so that she could assist Jack in his work. Lewis gave up writing non-fiction and apologetical books after he published Miracles in 1947. Some people have argued it was because Elizabeth Anscombe so devastatingly attacked a part of the book. In any case Joy Davidman pushed him to take up non-fiction once more and as a result she helped him produce Reflections on the Psalms (1958) and she enthusiastically talked him out of a writer's block so he could finally go forward with his long-time coming Letters to Malcolm, Chiefly on Prayer.


Lewis believed his best book was Till We Have Faces, and most students of his books agree. He unabashedly dedicated this classic to Joy Davidman and many saw her in the novel's character Orual. To the point, Lewis believed that Joy helped complete him as a person, and she acknowledged that he did the same for her. A careful reader will also find Joy's fingerprints on several of his other works, all the way from the double-meaning title of Surprised by Joy to some words and phrases in the Chronicles of Narnia. But the clearest evidence of her impact on his thinking and writing is in The Four Loves and A Grief Observed. Lewis might have written The Four Loves without Joy as his wife, but it would have been much less profound and certainly more theoretical than experiential. And finally A Grief Observed, could never have been written without the love and pain of Jack's life with Joy.


In the final analysis, then, those of us who thank God for the way C.S. Lewis has been our teacher through his books, must also be grateful for Joy Davidman Lewis. Without her the Lewis collection would be smaller and poorer."


~ Lyle W. Dorsett's biography of Joy Davidman: And God Came In


________________________


"A Jewish girl from the Bronx, Davidman was a grasping, competitive student in high school and at Hunter College. She became a naïve Communist, very late to see the truth about Stalin. As a contributing editor at New Masses, she dutifully subordinated artistic merit to party line. Her ethics could be dodgy: Short on contributions to an edited volume of international poetry, she attributed her own poems to Russian and English poets.


“She had fun with the job,” Santa­maria writes of her subject’s subterfuge. “Joy wrote of ‘shires,’ ‘Sherwood Forest’ and ‘working chaps’ riding home on the ‘Underground,’ and she took care with her spelling of words like ‘colour’ and ‘valour.’ ” She gave an author she invented a convenient biography: “Hayden Weir was killed in action in 1942.”
  
Through their letters, Davidman fell in love with Lewis, although at first he did not seem to reciprocate. Still, in 1952, she set sail for England, leaving behind her husband and sons, making no secret of her intentions. Where others had tried — Lewis had female epistolary suitors to spare — Joy Davidman Gresham succeeded. On April 23, 1956, she married him.

After, that is, securing from her husband a divorce and custody of their two boys, whom she sent to a boarding school selected in part because it was endorsed by P.L. Travers, the creator of Mary Poppins. The boys were miserable, but they were becoming proper Brits. “You should hear Doug clip his words and broaden his A’s!” Davidman wrote to their father.

What redeems the book, and perhaps the woman herself, is that she and Lewis were happy. The homely American, disliked by Lewis’s friends for her Hebraism and her pushiness, had with the old man a very real intimacy. They laughed, drank, and copulated through the pain of her advancing cancer.

“The house pulsed with love and laughter,” Santamaria writes. “They played Scrabble together — words in any language were fair game — and did crosswords.” They named her bedpan after Shakespeare’s Caliban and the “ ‘fishtailed female invalid urinal’ after Miranda.”

STAGES OF LIFE

"I’ve been asked to speak about old age, and as I’m now 86,1 think I’m qualified to speak about it. And I should say to begin with, that the last twenty years of my life have been probably the most creative and most enriching of all. And so, perhaps this will be an important message, because many people seem to think that old age is a falling away, a gradual breaking down, but as for me it’s been a continual renewal.







I like to think of human existence in three stages: the first stage, called the stage of adolescence, is the gradual growth of physical maturity for the first twenty years and during that time the mind and the character are beginning to develop, sexual desires are awakening and the person comes to the border of maturity. The next twenty years, 20 - 40, are the stages of psychological maturity; the capacities which have been developing in adolescence come to flower, and normally the person marries, has a family, they take work, find a profession and they develop all their different powers for sport, for arts and poetry and all the different aspects of life.


Now most people think that is the end of life and the aim is to prolong that period as long as possible into the fifties or the sixties. And when that begins to decline, your faculties begin to decline, you can’t do what you did before, you begin to think you’re failing, and so old age is a gradual senescence, a gradual loss of power. And I want to suggest the opposite, that the third stage of life should normally begin in the forties. That 20 - 40 yrs. is an intermediate period, it’s not final, and that the final period begins more or less in the forties so it’s been prepared before when not merely the physical and psychological, but the spiritual powers begin to develop, and for many people today this dimension has been lost—that beyond the physical and psychological there’s nothing to expect. But the spiritual is precisely the part which transcends the physical and psychological and opens us to the eternal, so as we enter into the third phase, we begin to discover the transcendent capacities in our nature—that we’re capable of transcending the body and transcending the mind and discovering the deep source of all reality.





I like to think of the first millennium, 500 - 600 B.C., as a time in human history when humanity awoke fully to this dimension. It’s been present before, from the beginning actually, it slowly emerges in the first stage and it begins to emerge properly in the second, but only in the third stage, which it dramatically reached in the first millennium, does it break through. So everybody should, in the forties, begin to break through to this third phase, where the spirit is open to the transcendent, the infinite, the eternal, the one reality, whatever name we like to give to it.


So old age should be the flowering of the whole personality, and in a deep sense, I think I could say, we’re not fully human persons until we enter into the third phase, the phase of the spirit. And everything indicates that at that phase we go beyond space and time. The first stage, the physical, we’re growing in
space and developing the body; the second phase we’re growing in time and developing the various faculties of the mind and so on; in the third stage, we’re transcending space and time, discovering the whole order of eternity and infinity and the whole which embraces all these other parts and other elements in our lives.








So the real aim of life is to prepare for the third stage, for the awakening of the spirit, which can, mind you, that was present, mind you, in the very earliest stage and can flower at an earlier stage. Some people at a very young age awake to the spirit, others during the more mature period discover something of it, but for everybody I feel, the possibility is there of discovering it in the third stage. And that is where mystical experience begins, but not only mystical experience, but a whole way of seeing life, of seeing yourself, of seeing your whole existence in a new concept, in the light of a whole which embraces all your previous experience.




So that really opens up hope to people because many people seem to be hopeless, that in old age there’s nothing more to expect except the gradual decline. But the shedding of the body which takes place at the end of the third stage, is simply the final stage; the body has grown and matured, it’s come to it’s fulfillment and now it’s ready to go. And when the body is shed then the soul, the psyche, has a greater freedom, and is able to unite with the spirit in a more meaningful way, and the whole personality, the whole being finally passes and reaches it’s fulfillment, not in this world of space and time, but in the eternal world which is the world of reality. So that’s the hope of the future."


~ "Bede Griffiths was a monk, a man in whom there was no guile, and was last to see the guile that may have been in any other. This monk with a universal heart was an icon of integrity and guilelessness. As John Henry Cardinal Newman once described them, Bede was one of those “who live in a way least thought of by others, the way chosen by our Savior, to make headway against all the power and wisdom of the world. It is a difficult and rare virtue, to mean what we say, to love without deceit, to think no evil, to bear no grudge, to be free from selfishness, to be innocent and straightforward… simple-hearted. They take everything in good part which happens to them, and make the best of everyone.” ~ Pascaline Coff



Saturday, January 27, 2018

Break From Facebook

I'm taking a break from Facebook (for a couple of weeks) to focus on my health and balance. All things in moderation.
Samuel Long ️






“ DOES SOCIAL MEDIA AFFECT THE QUALITY OF OUR LIVES?
THIS EXPERIMENT WAS CONDUCTED ON 1095 PEOPLE IN DENMARK. WE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED HALF OF THEM TO THE FOLLOWING TASK:

DO NOT USE FACEBOOK FOR ONE WEEK.

94%visit Facebook as part of a daily routine
78% use Facebook30 minutes or more daily
86% browse the news feed often or very often
69% prefer to post pictures of the great thingsthey experience
61% prefer to post their good sides on Facebook

SOCIAL MEDIA IS A NON STOP GREAT NEWS CHANNEL. A CONSTANT FLOW OF EDITED LIVES WHICH DISTORTS OUR PERCEPTION OF REALITY.
THE HAPPINESS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: WHAT WE DID


In this experimental study we wanted to test if Facebook use affects our subjective well-being. 1095 people participated in the experiment. We asked them to evaluate their lives on different dimensions.Then we randomly allocated the participants to either:

-The control group (continue to use Facebook as usual)
-The treatment group (no Facebook use for an entire week)





After one week we asked all of them to evaluate their lives again.

AFTER ONE WEEK WITHOUT FACEBOOK THE TREATMENT GROUP REPORTED A SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER LEVEL OF LIFE SATISFACTION.
AFTER ONE WEEK WITHOUT FACEBOOK THE TREATMENT GROUP EXPERIENCED LESS CONCENTRATION DIFFICULTIES.
PEOPLE ON FACEBOOK ARE 55% MORE LIKELYTO FEEL STRESSED.
PEOPLE TAKING A BREAK FROM FACEBOOK ARE 18% MORELIKELY TO FEEL PRESENT IN THE MOMENT.
AFTER ONE WEEK WITHOUT FACEBOOK THE TREATMENT GROUP FELT THEY WASTED THEIR TIME LESS.

5 OUT OF 10 ENVY THE #AMAZING EXPERIENCES OF OTHERS POSTED ON FACEBOOK
1 OUT OF 3 ENVY HOW #HAPPY OTHER PEOPLE SEEM ON FACEBOOK
4 OUT OF 10 ENVY THE APPARENT #SUCCESS OF OTHERS ON FACEBOOK
PEOPLE ON FACEBOOK ARE 39% MORE LIKELY TO FEEL LESS HAPPY THAN THEIR FRIENDS.

INSTEAD OF FOCUSING ON WHAT WE ACTUALLY NEED, WE HAVE AN UNFORTUNATE TENDENCY TO FOCUS ON WHAT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE.”







~ The Happiness Research Institute,
Suomisvej 4
1927 Frederiksberg (Copenhagen)
Denmark

"How do you measure happiness?
Building on measurement guidelines and benchmarks from the OECD and UN, we combine qualitative and quantitative methods to provide insights on the level of well-being, happiness and quality of life.

Whether we measure happiness, well-being or quality of life we are faced with the same challenges. They are all complex concepts. Therefore, we need to analyze different components. Much like when we examine how the economy is doing we can look at GDP per capita, growth, unemployment, inflation and interest rates. Each indicator gives us information about the status of the economy. Similarly, when we measure quality of life - we can examine different dimensions such as the cognitive, the affective and the eudaimonic dimension.The cognitive dimension focuses on an overall life satisfaction and is the indicator, which is the basis for many international rankings such as the World Happiness Report. The affective dimension focus more on what kind of emotions – both positive and negative - people experience on a daily basis such as joy, worry and stress. The eudaimomic dimension builds on Aristotle’s perception of the good life and thus focuses on purpose and meaning.These are all subjective measures – and we consider that to be a good thing.

What we care about is how people feel about their life. We believe people themselves are the best judge of whether they are happy or not. Working with subjective measures is difficult, but it is not impossible. We do it all the time, when it comes to stress, anxiety and depression – which are also subjective phenomenons - at the end of the day, it is all about how we as individuals experience our lives. What we ideally do is we follow people over time, and see how changes in life circumstances impact the different dimensions of happiness. How does e.g. unemployment, sickness, or a raise in income affect the different dimensions?"

Outrage Upon The Soul

"My first experience of life, as I now remember it, and I remember it but hazily, began in the family of my grandmother and grandfather, Betsey and Isaac Bailey. They were considered old settlers in the neighborhood, and from certain circumstances I infer that my grandmother, especially, was held in high esteem, far higher than was the lot of most colored persons in that region. She was a good nurse, and a capital hand at making nets used for catching shad and herring, and was, withal, somewhat famous as a fisherwoman. I have known her to be in the water waist deep, for hours, seine-hauling. She was a gardener as well as a fisherwoman, and remarkable for her success in keeping her seedling sweet potatoes through the months of winter, and easily got the reputation of being born to "good luck."

In planting-time Grandmother Betsey was sent for in all directions, simply to place the seedling potatoes in the hills or drills; for superstition had it that her touch was needed to make them grow. This reputation was full of advantage to her and her grandchildren, for a good crop, after her planting for the neighbors, brought her a share of the harvest. Whether because she was too old for field service, or because she had so faithfully discharged the duties of her station in early life, I know not, but she enjoyed the high privilege of living in a cabin separate from the quarters, having imposed upon her only the charge of the young children and the burden of her own support. She esteemed it great good fortune to live so, and took much comfort in having the children.

The practice of separating mothers from their children and hiring them out at distances too great to admit of their meeting, save at long intervals, was a marked feature of the cruelty and barbarity of the slave system; but it was in harmony with the grand aim of that system, which always and everywhere sought to reduce man to a level with the brute. It had no interest in recognizing or preserving any of the ties that bind families together or to their homes. My grandmother's five daughters were hired out in this way, and my only recollections of my own mother are of a few hasty visits made in the night on foot, after the daily tasks were over, and when she was under the necessity of returning in time to respond to the driver's call to the field in the early morning.

These little glimpses of my mother, obtained under such circumstances and against such odds, meager as they were, are ineffaceably stamped upon my memory. She was tall and finely proportioned, of dark, glossy complexion, with regular features, and amongst the slaves was remarkably sedate and dignified. There is, in "Prichard's Natural History of Man," the head of a figure, on 57, the features of which so resemble my mother that I often recur to it with something of the feelings which I suppose others experience when looking upon the likenesses of their own dear departed ones.

Of my father I know nothing. Slavery had no recognition of fathers, as none of families. That the mother was a slave was enough for its deadly purpose. By its law the child followed the condition of its mother. The father might be a freeman and the child a slave. The father might be a white man, glorying in the purity of his Anglo-Saxon blood, and the child ranked with the blackest slaves. Father he might be, and not be husband, and could sell his own child without incurring reproach, if in its veins coursed one drop of African blood...

LIVING thus with my grandmother, whose kindness and love stood in place of my mother's, it was some time before I knew myself to be a slave. I knew many other things before I knew that. Her little cabin had to me the attractions of a palace. Its fence-railed floor--which was equally floor and bedstead--up stairs, and its clay floor down stairs, its dirt and straw chimney, and windowless sides, and that most curious piece of workmanship, the ladder stairway, and the hole so strangely dug in front of the fire-place, beneath which grandmamma placed her sweet potatoes, to keep them from frost in winter, were full of interest to my childish observation.

The squirrels, as they skipped the fences, climbed the trees, or gathered their nuts, were an unceasing delight to me. There, too, right at the side of the hut, stood the old well, with its stately and skyward-pointing beam, so aptly placed between the limbs of what had once been a tree, and so nicely balanced, that I could move it up and down with only one hand, and could get a drink myself without calling for help. Nor were these all the attractions of the place. At a little distance stood Mr. Lee's mill, where the people came in large numbers to get their corn ground. I can never tell the many things thought and felt, as I sat on the bank and watched that mill, and the turning of its ponderous wheel. The mill-pond, too, had its charms; and with my pin-hook and thread-line, I could get amusing nibbles if I could catch no fish.

It was not long, however, before I began to learn the sad fact that this house of my childhood belonged not to my dear old grandmother, but to some one I had never seen, and who lived a great distance off. I learned, too, the sadder fact, that not only the home and lot, but that grandmother herself and all the little children around her belonged to a mysterious personage, called by grandmother, with every mark of reverence, "Old Master." Thus early did clouds and shadows begin to fall upon my path. I learned that this old master, whose name seemed ever to be mentioned with fear and shuddering, only allowed the little children to live with grandmother for a limited time, and that as soon as they were big enough they were promptly taken away to live with the said old master. These were distressing revelations, indeed.

My grandmother was all the world to me, and the thought of being separated from her was a most unwelcome suggestion to my affections and hopes. This mysterious old master was really a man of some consequence. He owned several farms in Tuckahoe, was the chief clerk and butler on the home plantation of Colonel Lloyd, had overseers as well as slaves on his own farms, and gave directions to the overseers on the farms owned by Colonel Lloyd. Captain Aaron Anthony, for such is the name and title of my old master, lived on Colonel Lloyd's plantation, which was situated on the Wye river, and which was one of the largest, most fertile, and best appointed in the State.

About this plantation and this old master I was most eager to know everything which could be known; and, unhappily for me, all the information I could get concerning him increased my dread of being separated from my grandmother and grandfather. I wished that it was possible for me to remain small all my life, knowing that the sooner I grew large the shorter would be my time to remain with them. Everything about the cabin became doubly dear and I was sure that there could be no other spot on earth equal to it. But the time came when I must go, and my grandmother, knowing my fears, and in pity for them, kindly kept me ignorant of the dreaded moment up to the morning (a beautiful summer morning) when we were to start; and, indeed, during the whole journey, which, child as I was, I remember as well as if it were yesterday, she kept the unwelcome truth hidden from me.

The distance from Tuckahoe to Colonel Lloyd's, where my old master lived, was full twelve miles, and the walk was quite a severe test of the endurance of my young legs. The journey would have proved too severe for me, but that my dear old grandmother (blessings on her memory) afforded occasional relief by "toteing" me on her shoulder. Advanced in years as she was, as was evident from the more than one gray hair which peeped from between the ample and graceful folds of her newly and smoothly-ironed bandana turban, grandmother was yet a woman of power and spirit.

She was remarkably straight in figure, and elastic and muscular in movement. I seemed hardly to be a burden to her. She would have "toted" me farther, but I felt myself too much of a man to allow it. Yet while I walked I was not independent of her. She often found me holding her skirts lest something should come out of the woods and eat me up. Several old logs and stumps imposed upon me, and got themselves taken for enormous animals. I could plainly see their legs, eyes, ears, and teeth, till I got close enough to see that the eyes were knots, washed white with rain, and the legs were broken limbs, and the ears and teeth only such because of the point from which they were seen. As the day advanced the heat increased, and it was not until the afternoon that we reached the much-dreaded end of the journey.

Here I found myself in the midst of a group of children of all sizes and of many colors,--black, brown, copper-colored, and nearly white. I had not before seen so many children. As a new-comer I was an object of special interest. After laughing and yelling around me and playing all sorts of wild tricks, they asked me to go out and play with them. This I refused to do.

Grandmamma looked sad, and I could not help feeling that our being there boded no good to me. She was soon to lose another object of affection, as she had lost many before. Affectionately patting me on the head, she told me to be a good boy and go out to play with the children. They are "kin to you," she said, "go and play with them." She pointed out to me my brother Perry, and my sisters, Sarah and Eliza. I had never seen them before, and though I had sometimes heard of them and felt a curious interest in them, I really did not understand what they were to me or I to them. Brothers and sisters we were by blood, but slavery had made us strangers. They were already initiated into the mysteries of old master's domicile, and they seemed to look upon me with a certain degree of compassion. I really wanted to play with them, but they were strangers to me, and I was full of fear that my grandmother might leave for home without taking me with her.

Entreated to do so, however, and that, too, by my dear grandmother, I went to the back part of the house to play with them and the other children. Play, however, I did not, but stood with my back against the wall witnessing the playing of the others. At last, while standing there, one of the children, who had been in the kitchen, ran up to me in a sort of roguish glee, exclaiming, "Fed, Fed, grandmamma gone!" I could not believe it. Yet, fearing the worst, I ran into the kitchen to see for myself, and lo! she was indeed gone, and was now far away, and "clean" out of sight. I need not tell all that happened now.

Almost heart-broken at the discovery, I fell upon the ground and wept a boy's bitter tears, refusing to be comforted. My brother gave me peaches and pears to quiet me, but I promptly threw them on the ground. I had never been deceived before and something of resentment mingled with my grief at parting with my grandmother. It was now late in the afternoon. The day had been an exciting and wearisome one, and I know not where, but I suppose I sobbed myself to sleep; and its balm was never more welcome to any wounded soul than to mine.

The reader may be surprised that I relate so minutely an incident apparently so trivial, and which must have occurred when I was less than seven years old; but, as I wish to give a faithful history of my experience in slavery, I cannot withhold a circumstance which at the time affected me so deeply, and which I still remember so vividly. Besides, this was my first introduction to the realities of the slave system..."

ONCE established on the home plantation of Col. Lloyd--I was with the children there, left to the tender mercies of Aunt Katy, a slave woman, who was to my master what he was to Col. Lloyd. Disposing of us in classes or sizes, he left to Aunt Katy all the minor details concerning our management. She was a woman who never allowed herself to act greatly within the limits of delegated power, no matter how broad that authority might be. Ambitious of old master's favor, ill-tempered and cruel by nature, she found in her present position an ample field for the exercise of her ill-omened qualities.

She had a strong hold upon old master, for she was a first-rate cook, and very industrious. She was therefore greatly favored by him--and as one mark of his favor she was the only mother who was permitted to retain her children around her, and even to these, her own children, she was often fiendish in her brutality. Cruel, however, as she sometimes was to her own children, she was not destitute of maternal feeling, and in her instinct to satisfy their demands for food she was often guilty of starving me and the other children. Want of food was my chief trouble during my first summer here.

Captain Anthony, instead of allowing a given quantity of food to each slave, committed the allowance for all to Aunt Katy, to be divided by her, after cooking, amongst us. The allowance consisted of coarse corn-meal, not very abundant, and which, by passing through Aunt Katy's hands, became more slender still for some of us. I have often been so pinched with hunger as to dispute with old "Nep," the dog, for the crumbs which fell from the kitchen table. Many times have I followed, with eager step, the waiting-girl when she shook the table-cloth, to get the crumbs and small bones flung out for the dogs and cats. It was a great thing to have the privilege of dipping a piece of bread into the water in which meat had been boiled, and the skin taken from the rusty bacon was a positive luxury.

With this description of the domestic arrangements of my new home, I may here recount a circumstance which is deeply impressed on my memory, as affording a bright gleam of a slave-mother's love, and the earnestness of a mother's care. I had offended Aunt Katy. I do not remember in what way, for my offences were numerous in that quarter, greatly depending upon her moods as to their heinousness, and she had adopted her usual mode of punishing me: namely, making me go all day without food. For the first hour or two after dinner time, I succeeded pretty well in keeping up my spirits; but as the day wore away, I found it quite impossible to do so any longer. Sundown came, but no bread; and in its stead came the threat from Aunt Katy, with a scowl well-suited to its terrible import, that she would starve the life out of me.

Brandishing her knife, she chopped off the heavy slices of bread for the other children, and put the loaf away, muttering all the while her savage designs upon myself. Against this disappointment, for I was expecting that her heart would relent at last, I made an extra effort to maintain my dignity, but when I saw the other children around me with satisfied faces, I could stand it no longer. I went out behind the kitchen wall and cried like a fine fellow. When wearied with this, I returned to the kitchen, sat by the fire and brooded over my hard lot. I was too hungry to sleep. While I sat in the corner, I caught sight of an ear of Indian corn upon an upper shelf. I watched my chance and got it; and shelling off a few grains, I put it back again. These grains I quickly put into the hot ashes to roast. I did this at the risk of getting a brutal thumping, for Aunt Katy could beat as well as starve me. My corn was not long in roasting, and I eagerly pulled it from the ashes, and placed it upon a stool in a clever little pile.

I began to help myself, when who but my own dear mother should come in. The scene which followed is beyond my power to describe. The friendless and hungry boy, in his extremest need, found himself in the strong, protecting arms of his mother. I have before spoken of my mother's dignified and impressive manner. I shall never forget the indescribable expression of her countenance when I told her that Aunt Katy had said she would starve the life out of me. There was deep and tender pity in her glance at me, and, at the same moment, a fiery indignation at Aunt Katy, and while she took the corn from me, and gave in its stead a large ginger-cake, she read Aunt Katy a lecture which was never forgotten.

That night I learned as I had never learned before, that I was not only a child, but somebody's child. I was grander upon my mother's knee than a king upon his throne. But my triumph was short. I dropped off to sleep, and waked in the morning to find my mother gone and myself at the mercy again of the virago in my master's kitchen, whose fiery wrath was my constant dread..."

-- LIFE AND TIMES OF FREDERICK DOUGLASS
"The most influential African American of the nineteenth century, Douglass made a career of agitating the American conscience. He spoke and wrote on behalf of a variety of reform causes: women's rights, temperance, peace, land reform, free public education, and the abolition of capital punishment. But he devoted the bulk of his time, immense talent, and boundless energy to ending slavery and gaining equal rights for African Americans. These were the central concerns of his long reform career. Douglass understood that the struggle for emancipation and equality demanded forceful, persistent, and unyielding agitation. And he recognized that African Americans must play a conspicuous role in that struggle. Less than a month before his death, when a young black man solicited his advice to an African American just starting out in the world, Douglass replied without hesitation: "Agitate! Agitate! Agitate!"

"Douglass founded the North Star, a weekly publication with the motto "Right is of no sex, Truth is of no color, God is the Father of us all, and we are all Brethren." Douglass later wrote a letter to his former slaveholder, in which he denounced him for leaving Douglass's family illiterate:

Your wickedness and cruelty committed in this respect on your fellow creatures, are greater than all the stripes you have laid upon my back or theirs. It is an outrage upon the soul, a war upon the immortal spirit, and one for which you must give account at the bar of our common Father and Creator.

— Letter to His Old Master. To my Old Master Thomas Auld.

Sometimes considered a precursor of a non-denominational liberation theology, Douglass was a deeply spiritual man, as his home continues to show. The fireplace mantle features busts of two of his favorite philosophers, David Friedrich Strauss, author of "The Life of Jesus," and Ludwig Feuerbach, author of "The Essence of Christianity."

Bunch of Bull

"There’s an old Zen story where a monk’s sitting in meditation and his master walks up to him and says, ‘What are you doing?’ He says, ‘I’m polishing my mind so it becomes like a mirror and reflects reality perfectly.’

Isn’t that a nice spiritual idea? The only problem is that it’s a bunch of bull.

So the teacher leans over and picks up this tile off the floor - two tiles - and starts rubbing two tiles together as a response to what his student said.
And the student said, ‘What are you rubbing two tiles together for?’
(Teacher) says, ‘Cause I’m trying to make a perfect mirror.’

And the student, embarrassingly, understood the point. No amount of tile polishing will make the tiles into a perfect mirror. No amount of mind polishing will make the mind unconditioned.

Only the unconditioned is unconditioned.

Your own awareness itself is unconditioned.

Have you noticed?

Not what you are aware of, that’s conditioned to the hilt. But the awareness itself - is completely unconditioned.

It’s as unconditioned as the day before you were born. And by paying attention to that, by just resting as that awareness - spontaneously an unconditioned consciousness becomes conscious of itself. That’s what spiritual awakening is - unconditioned consciousness becomes conscious of itself."

- Adyashanti

Photo -- American-born zen monk Hyon Gak sunim whi teaches in the Korean tradition. He is the current abbot of Bulyee Seon Center in Germany, and teaches especially in Germany and Greece.

Little Hope For Advancement

"See if you can catch yourself complaining, in either speech or thought, about a situation you find yourself in, what other people do or say, your surroundings, your life situation, even the weather. To complain is always nonacceptance of what is. It invariably carries an unconscious negative charge. When you complain, you make yourself into a victim. When you speak out, you are in your power. So change the situation by taking action or by speaking out if necessary or possible; leave the situation or accept it. All else is madness.

Ordinary unconsciousness is always linked in some way with denial of the Now. The Now, of course, also implies the here. Are you resisting your here and now? Some people would always rather be somewhere else. Their "here" is never good enough. Through self-observation, find out if that is the case in your life. Wherever you are, be there totally. If you find your here and now intolerable and it makes you unhappy, you have three options: remove yourself from the situation, change it, or accept it totally. If you want to take responsibility for your life, you must choose one of those three options, and you must choose now. Then accept the consequences. No excuses. No negativity. No psychic pollution. Keep your inner space clear.

If you take any action—leaving or changing your situation—drop the negativity first, if at all possible. Action arising out of insight into what is required is more effective than action arising out of negativity. Any action is often better than no action, especially if you have been stuck in an unhappy situation for a long time. If it is a mistake, at least you learn something, in which case it’s no longer a mistake. If you remain stuck, you learn nothing. Is fear preventing you from taking action? Acknowledge the fear, watch it, take your attention into it, be fully present with it. Doing so cuts the link between the fear and your thinking. Don’t let the fear rise up into your mind. Use the power of the Now. Fear cannot prevail against it.

If there is truly nothing that you can do to change you’re here and now, and you can’t remove yourself from the situation, then accept your here and now totally by dropping all inner resistance. The false, unhappy self that loves feeling miserable, resentful, or sorry for itself can then no longer survive. This is called surrender. Surrender is not weakness. There is great strength in it. Only a surrendered person has spiritual power. Through surrender, you will be free internally of the situation. You may then find that the situation changes without any effort on your part. In any case, you are free. Or is there something that you "should" be doing but are not doing it? Get up and do it now. Alternatively, completely accept your inactivity, laziness, or passivity at this moment, if that is your choice. Go into it fully. Enjoy it. Be as lazy or inactive as you can. If you go into it fully and consciously, you will soon come out of it. Or maybe you won’t. Either way, there is no inner conflict, no resistance, no negativity...

Are you stressed? Are you so busy getting to the future that the present is reduced to a means of getting there? Stress is caused by being "here" but wanting to be "there," or being in the present but wanting to be in the future. It’s a split that tears you apart inside. To create and live with such an inner split is insane. The fact that everyone else is doing it doesn’t make it any less insane. If you have to, you can move fast, work fast, or even run, without projecting yourself into the future and without resisting the present. As you move, work, run—do it totally. Enjoy the flow of energy, the high energy of that moment. Now you are no longer stressed, no longer splitting yourself in two. Just moving, running, working—and enjoying it. Or you can drop the whole thing and sit on a park bench. But when you do, watch your mind. It may say: "You should be working. You are wasting time." Observe the mind. Smile at it. Does the past take up a great deal of your attention? Do you frequently talk and think about it, either positively or negatively? The great things that you have achieved, your adventures or experiences, or your victim story and the dreadful things that were done to you, or maybe what you did to someone else? Are your thought processes creating guilt, pride, resentment, anger, regret, or self-pity? Then you are not only reinforcing a false sense of self but also helping to accelerate your body’s aging process by creating an accumulation of past in your psyche. Verify this for yourself by observing those around you who have a strong tendency to hold on to the past.

Die to the past every moment. You don’t need it. Only refer to it when it is absolutely relevant to the present. Feel the power of this moment and the fullness of Being. Feel your presence."

-- The Power of Now ©1999 by Eckhart Tolle.
Eckhart Tolle is the author of numerous books including the New York Times bestsellers The Power of Now (translated into 33 languages) and A New Earth, which are widely regarded as two of the most influential spiritual books of our time.

Both “Holla”and Help Somebody

"Black Preaching is like the playing of an old Motown hit, no matter what the contemporary or popular genre is, old-school Black Preaching still moves the listener. Kirk Byron Jones in his comparative view of jazz and preaching has said that when jazz is truly swinging, the world is challenged to present a greater manifestation of joy.[i] Likewise, old-school Black Preaching that is birthed from the joy of the preacher brings joy to the listener and causes the sleeping soul to dance the way it use to dance. The rhetorical approaches and holy utterances of yesteryear that were liberating, comforting, and hopeful back then are still capable of moving the hearts and minds of modern-day listeners as well as helping to bridge the generational gap between congregants.

Furthermore, old-school Black Preaching whereby both biblical and non-biblical “holy sayings”are contextualized with appropriate commentary and partnered with sound biblical hermeneutics and congregational exegesis can become the music that directs the dance between the preacher and church member. I can recall how countless wedding receptions, birthday parties, and retirement ceremonies that included formal addresses, dinner, and dance became truly festive and how new memories were created and relationships were re-established after a rhythmic old-school jam like Marvin Gaye’s “Got to Give it Up,”Frankie Beverly’s “Before I Let Go,”Al Green’s “Love and Happiness,”or Marcia Griffiths’“Electric Slide”rang out.

Noticeably, attendees of different generations collided together on the floor—dancing and relating to the same rhythm and song that reverberated love, community, and happiness.  I believe that the preaching of some of our non-biblical ancestral and holy sayings that were formed from our Christian experience, with many written as spirituals or hymns, have that same effect within the dancehall of liturgical preaching. In order to become the music that compels each one to dance and become acquainted with their partner, the meaning of these holy sayings must be constructed on behalf of the listeners by the preacher. The old-school sermonic song of Black Preaching must have contemporary relevance.

As Lenora Tubbs Tisdale states, “Two things which had not previously been placed side-by-side—namely a particular biblical text (or texts) and a particular congregational context—are allowed to live together and talk together and dance with one another in the imagination of the preacher, until something new occurs through their encounter.”[ii] It is my contention that this imaginative dance within the preacher’s mind is not only an appropriate hermeneutical approach to constructing congregational and cultural meaning of an old text, but it is what takes place when the preaching is played in the ballroom of Black sanctuaries in particular.

I have attended many church services to which I was invited as guest minister for a special occasion worship service or as the week-long revivalist. To my consternation I have often been the youngest person in attendance. Even as a thirty-plus year old preacher who was reared in rural Virginia, I still attend services where I am the only person less than forty years old and in some cases where I am looked upon as a child by many of the more seasoned congregants. Members in these churches seem to view younger preachers as being influenced by popular televangelistic preaching, and they assume that there is some inherent generational detachment, particularly when it comes to church matters. “What can this young fella say to us?”In response, I would simply stand to my feet and remind the church that “God is good,”and in response they would say, “All the time,”followed by my resounding affirmation, that “All the time,”drawing their collective response, “God is good!”I would make it clear that the same God that “woke them up early this morning, clothed in their right mind, with blood still running warm through their veins”is the same God that “started me on my way.” Upon displaying my knowledge and genuine appreciation of the “holy sayings”within the Black Church I felt a mutual kindred and welcoming spirit as I heard more clearly what was not being said: “Preach preacher!”We were now able to sermonically dance with one another to a familiar song while still leaving room for a re-mix or fresh word to come forth. In order for me to bring forth a convicting and culturally relevant word that would address their contemporary needs I had to enter through the door of familiarity.

Samuel DeWitt Proctor wrote, “Preaching at its best will begin where the people are, and educate them in the possibilities of refined and improved human relations.”[iii] Preaching in a sense does not commence from the pulpit, but it rather starts in the pews. Henry H. Mitchell brought this reality to my remembrance when he stated:   The mainstream middle class churches of today are suffering   decline, in part because their clergy have been taught to scoff at and war against the “less intellectual”belief system of the average member…. If such clergy had only instructed the people from the people’s own frame of reference, then the people might have gladly defended the pastor’s right to follow his or her prophetic conscience.[iv]  

Through experiences such as this I learned that through robust theological and rhetorical appropriation to preaching of the holy sayings of the Black Church experience, preachers can harness vernacular rhetoric to enhance communal identification among African American Christians in particular and all believing listeners in general.[v] There is a music in preaching that Black churches love to hear that transcends style. The connection is not primarily made in the climatic and celebratory whoop, tune, squall, or vivid and affecting imagery of hope in the final stages of the sermon. I concur with Frank A. Thomas: “Celebration in the final stage of the sermon functions as the joyful and ecstatic reinforcement of the truth already taught and delivered in the main body of the sermon.”[vi] The good news ought to joyfully lift the preacher and cause a celebratory cry that is oftentimes expressed in stylish utterances; however, preachers should not wait for the last sermonic song to expect the congregation to then stand and dance with the Word of God. The bond and dance between the pulpit and pew must be initiated from the beginning and throughout the preaching with theologically substantive and shared sayings as the rhythm and blues of Black Preaching.        

There is some type of prophetic attractiveness for one who possesses a young face but old soul that is expressed through one’s demeanor and delivery. The elocution that I am referring to is the kind that is without wordiness or the purpose of proving one’s own knowledge or ability to keep it real, but which is genuine and a part of one’s lived experience. In order to speak in tongues, the preacher must know the indigenous or native language, or in this case the “folk theology”of the particular community of faith.[vii] Folk theology is theology that a community of people treasures and lives by that is expressed in folklore.

Black Christian folklore is expressive culture that includes tales, music, dance, popular beliefs, proverbs, and oral traditions as transmitters of Black folk theology. Black Preaching is a constituent of Black folklore. I agree with Tisdale: “Preaching as folk art (folklore) exhibits a preference for the simple, plain, conversational speech of the local congregation.”[viii] This is not anti-intellectualism but a vehicle to transmit a communal belief and create a path for new ideas. To violate the folklore is to victimize the folk theology.  The church knows that even an imposter can read and recite the bible as a means of persuasion, but in order to read the people one must appreciate and learn of the folklore. Many non-biblical liturgical sayings are a component of Black folklore, and one must know it in order to more fully communicate with the Black Church.  If the preacher does not know the idiomatic religious language of the people, the preacher will not be known by the people.

Henry H. Mitchell shared with me a time when he attended a lively and fairly traditional worship experience in California. Although he did not expect to witness this southern style of Black worship in this particular township, he authentically shifted his style and diction to accommodate the congregational setting and point of reference. He did not rob or cheat the Gospel, but he made a rhetorical adjustment whereby he shared with me, “Henry whooped that day.”[ix] I attended a revival service in Richmond several years ago at a church that has a prophetically charged and gifted pastor/preacher who is known for inviting high caliber preachers who can both “holla”and help somebody. At this revival, I witnessed a master of Black Sacred Rhetoric. This particular revivalist introduced himself in song and closed the service out in song, and somewhere in between that mini-concert there was a sermon. Once he approached the sacred desk he read from the scripture, prayed a prayer, and preached the Word that was accompanied with an abundance of these extra-biblical holy sayings that I call Black Sacred Rhetoric. The church was edified as both young and old packed the house each night and stood to their feet as a hopeful and convicting word cut them like a two-edged sword. This response was unlike any other response I had witnessed at this particular church that is known for having great revivalists and a prince of preaching as pastor. It was at that moment that I determined how Black Sacred Rhetoric and its exegetical appropriation could cause the people of God to dance with joy, leave informed, and be convinced that a change needed to be made in their lives. This preacher was in line with both Cicero’s and Augustine’s view on the role of eloquence and rhetoric.[x] This preacher touched all bases as he instructed, persuaded, and delighted the listening congregation.

This phenomenon now had credible practitioners and a community of people outside of the rural setting that longed to be reminded, “Everything that looks good to you, ain’t necessarily good for you,”and, “If you take one step, God will take two.”This old-school Black preaching was refreshing to a contemporary “what’s hot on the pop chart”society.   I must admit however that the employment of this religious vernacular has been a thorn in my flesh. Although I see its significance as a means of communal association as well as a passing on of a particular folk theology, it pains me to see the mishandling and abuse of such sacred sayings.

Some preachers use these “holy sayings”or what others call “holy clichés”as artificial signals. These holy sayings are unfortunately misappropriated in order to gain an emotional response from the people of God which in return arouses the preacher’s narcissistic appetite and feeds his or her plea for public affirmation. This in my view is the pseudo-prophetic prostitution of our sacred vernacular rhetoric, a rhetoric which in fact warrants and deserves to be reverently handled. 

I have also witnessed what I considered to be ill-prepared sermons whereby the preacher reaches into his or her bag of “grandma theology,”or what Henry H. Mitchell referred to me in the aforementioned interview as “Aunt Jane’s theology,”and tries his or her best to salvage the sermon by declaring that “He may not come when you want Him to, but He’s always right on time! Can I get a witness? That He will pick you up, tuuurrrn you around and place your feet on much higher ground. Can I get a witness that He’s an on time God? Ain’t He alright?  He’s alright I tell you. Ain’t He alright, ain’t He alright!”

My response is quite simply, “Yes, God is alright, and God will indeed totally transform our lives,”but where’s the theological and rhetorical connectivity to the sermon’s primary proposition? The lack of context to these holy sayings leads to the bastardization of this rich ancestral language."

-- Wyatt Tee Walker (August 16, 1928 – January 23, 2018) was an African-American pastor, national civil rights leader, theologian, and cultural historian. He was a chief of staff for Martin Luther King, Jr., and in 1958 became an early board member of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). He helped found a Congress for Racial Equality (CORE) chapter in 1958. As executive director of the SCLC from 1960 to 1964, Walker helped to bring the group to national prominence.

Expert in His Field

“There is in most of us a vast acreage of our inner estate which has never been touched by the plow. It remains uncultivated. We are this, we have been this, but how much more we might be. Coming to our self, our true self, and reaching out with divine help and the gift of Grace to win the whole of oneself is to be ‘spiritual-minded.'” ~ Rufus Jones

Flying Elephants

“The task of religion is not like that of laboriously endeavoring to teach an elephant to fly; it is rather the discovery of the potential capacities for flight in a being that was framed for the upper air.”

~ Rufus Jones
“Mystical union with the divine, according to Jones, was not a privilege reserved only for the great spiritual athletes. But Jones did not just theorize — he also popularized. His willingness to market himself to the masses was a critical stimulus towards the popular embrace of a mystical emphasis in liberal Protestant spirituality, both because of his own direct influence and because of his influence on even more popular writers such as Howard Thurman and Harry Emerson Fosdick. This middlebrowing of mysticism paved the way for the success of a wide range of mystical writers to come, starting with Thomas Merton and lasting into the New Age.” ~ Matthew S. Hedstrom, Rufus Jones and Mysticism for the Masses

The Relatives Came

"The Absolute does not stand alone. It has Relatives.

Relatives come to visit without any notice. They let themselves in. They won’t leave until they are allowed to stay. Sometimes they make a mess. But they are always Family. Even after they leave.

This is how the Absolute entertains itself over the holiday season.
And it’s always the holiday season, here in the house of You."

-- Jeff Foster

Fell, Hook and Tumble

“I am a woman sixty years old and of no special courage.
Everyday – a little conversation with God, or his envoy the tall pine,
or the grass-swimming cricket.
Everyday – I study the difference between water and stone.
Everyday – I stare at the world; I push the grass aside and stare at the world….
The spring pickerel in the burn and shine of the tight-packed water;
the sweetness of the child on the shore; also, its radiant temper;
the snail climbing the morning glories, carrying his heavy wheel;
the green throats of the lilies turning from the wind. This is the world….
Everyday – I have work to do: I feel my body rising through the water
not much more than a leaf; and I feel like the child, crazed by beauty
or filled to bursting with woe; and I am the snail in the universe of the leaves
trudging upward; and I am the pale lily who believes in God,
though she has no word for it, and I am the hunter, and I am the hounds,
and I am the fox, and I am the weeds of the field…
I am the dusty toad who looks up unblinking and sees (do you also see them?)
the white clouds in their blind, round-shouldered haste;
I am a woman sixty years old, and glory is my work.”

“I do know how to pay attention, how to fall down
into the grass, how to kneel down in the grass,
how to be idle and blessed, how to stroll through the fields,
which is what I have been doing all day.
Tell me, what else should I have done?
Doesn’t everything die at last, and too soon?
Tell me, what is it you plan to do
With your one wild and precious life?”

“Hello, sun in my face.
Hello, you who made the morning
and spread it over the fields
and into the faces of the tulips
and the nodding morning glories,
and into the windows of, even, the
miserable and the crotchety
best preacher that ever was,
dear star, that just happens
to be where you are in the universe
to keep us from ever-darkness,
to ease us with warm touching,
to hold us in the great hands of light-
good morning, good morning, good morning.
Watch, now, how I start the day
in happiness, in kindness.”

“Did you too see it, drifting, all night, on the black river?
Did you see it in the morning, rising into the silvery air-
An armful of white blossoms,
A perfect commotion of silk and linen as it leaned
into the bondage of its wings; a snowbank, a bank of lilies,
Biting the air with its black beak?
Did you hear it, fluting and whistling
A shrill dark music-like the rain pelting
the trees-like a waterfall
Knifing down the black ledges?
And did you see it, finally, just under the clouds-
A white cross Streaming across the sky, its feet
Like black leaves, its wings Like
the stretching light of the river?
And did you feel it, in your heart,
how it pertained to everything?
And have you too finally figured out what beauty is for?
And have you changed your life?”
Sleeping in the forest
“I thought the earth remembered me,
she took me back so tenderly,
arranging her dark skirts, her pockets
full of lichens and seeds.
I slept as never before, a stone on the river bed,
nothing between me and the white fire of the stars
but my thoughts, and they floated light as moths
among the branches of the perfect trees.
All night I heard the small kingdoms
breathing around me, the insects,
and the birds who do their work in the darkness.
All night I rose and fell, as if in water,
grappling with a luminous doom. By morning
I had vanished at least a dozen times
into something better.
There are things you can’t reach. But
You can reach out to them, and all day long.
The wind, the bird flying away. The idea of god.
And it can keep you busy as anything else, and happier.
I look; morning to night I am never done with looking.
Looking I mean not just standing around, but standing around
As though with your arms open.”

“Last night the rain spoke to me slowly, saying,
what joy to come falling out of the brisk cloud,
to be happy again in a new way on the earth!
That’s what it said as it dropped,
smelling of iron, and vanished
like a dream of the ocean into the branches
and the grass below.
Then it was over.
The sky cleared.
I was standing under a tree.
The tree was a tree with happy leaves,
and I was myself, and there were stars in the sky
that were also themselves at the moment
at which moment my right hand
was holding my left hand
which was holding the tree
which was filled with stars
and the soft rain- imagine! imagine!
the long and wondrous journeys
still to be ours.”

~ Mary Oliver (born 1935, aged 82) is an American poet, often characterized as a “nature mystic”, who has won the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize. The New York Times described her as “far and away, America’s best-selling poet”.
On a return visit to Austerlitz, in the late 1950s, Oliver met photographer Molly Malone Cook, who would become her partner for over forty years. In Our world she says “I took one look and fell, hook and tumble.” Cook was Oliver’s literary agent. They made their home largely in Provincetown, Massachusetts, where they lived until Cook’s death in 2005, and where Oliver still lives. Greatly valuing her personal privacy, Oliver has given very few interviews, saying she prefers for her writing to speak for itself. She recalls “I too fell in love with the town, that marvelous convergence of land and water; Mediterranean light; fishermen who made their living by hard and difficult work from frighteningly small boats; and, both residents and sometime visitors, the many artists and writers.[…] M. and I decided to stay.”

Mary Oliver’s poetry is grounded in memories of Ohio and her adopted home of New England, setting most of her poetry in and around Provincetown since she moved there in the 1960s. Influenced by both Whitman and Thoreau, she is known for her clear and poignant observances of the natural world. Her creativity is stirred by nature, and Oliver, an avid walker, often pursues inspiration on foot. Her poems are filled with imagery from her daily walks near her home: shore birds, water snakes, the phases of the moon and humpback whales. In Long life she says “I go off to my woods, my ponds, my sun-filled harbor, no more than a blue comma on the map of the world but, to me, the emblem of everything.” She commented in a rare interview “When things are going well, you know, the walk does not get rapid or get anywhere: I finally just stop, and write. That’s a successful walk!” She says that she once found herself walking in the woods with no pen and later hid pencils in the trees so she would never be stuck in that place again. She often carries a 3-by-5-inch hand-sewn notebook for recording impressions and phrases. Maxine Kumin calls Oliver “a patroller of wetlands in the same way that Thoreau was an inspector of snowstorms.”

Oliver has also been compared to Emily Dickinson, with whom she shares an affinity for solitude and inner monologues. Her poetry combines dark introspection with joyous release. Although she has been criticized for writing poetry that assumes a dangerously close relationship of women with nature, she finds the self is only strengthened through an immersion with nature. Oliver is also known for her unadorned language and accessible themes. The Harvard Review describes her work as an antidote to “inattention and the baroque conventions of our social and professional lives. She is a poet of wisdom and generosity whose vision allows us to look intimately at a world not of our making.”

The Universe Remembers

"Spiritual awakening is a remembering. It is not becoming something that we are not. It is not about transforming ourselves. It is not about changing ourselves. It is a remembering of what we are, as if we’d known it long ago and had simply forgotten.

At the moment of this remembering, if the remembering is authentic, it’s not viewed as a personal thing. There is really no such thing as a ‘personal’ awakening, because ‘personal’ would imply separation. ‘Personal’ would imply that it is the ‘me’ or the ego that awakens or becomes enlightened. But in a true awakening, it is realized very clearly that even the awakening itself is not personal.

It is universal Spirit or universal consciousness that wakes up to itself. Rather than the ‘me’ waking up, what we are wakes up from the ‘me.’ What we are wakes up from the seeker. What we are wakes up from the seeking."

~ Adyashanti

The End of Your World
http://bit.ly/1TGEcmr

Great Red Dragon

Some say The Book of Revelations is about the Roman Emperor Nero. Could this also be a channeled teaching? So what?

"I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ. I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet, Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia."

Revelation I.9-11

Art -- The Great Red Dragon Paintings are a series of watercolour paintings by the English poet and painter William Blake, painted between 1805 and 1810. It was during this period that Blake was commissioned to create over a hundred paintings intended to illustrate books of the Bible. These paintings depict 'The Great Red Dragon' in various scenes from the Book of Revelation.

And behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth.

— (Rev. 12:3-4, KJV)

Free To Play

"In the fall of 1975, I attended Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. I dual-majored in philosophy and English. My first two years at Clark were a crucible of Divine Heat in the endless inner transformations of meditative life. During this time of sadhana, sometimes a long and grueling affair filled with the most intense suffering, I lived only for the breakthroughs in Consciousness. I wished wholeheartedly to be ushered into a permanently awakened state of being. I lived guided invisibly by that blind, burning desire, and there was no respite, even during the times of repeated exposure to Transcendental Consciousness.

During this time, death and nothingness were my only friends. I had become oblivious to everything but the utter contradiction and unbearable friction between "I" (individuality) and "That" (Consciousness). Again and again, I surrendered into psychological/emotional/spiritual dissolution, this dying into consciousness. I was madly in love with oblivion, ecstasy and self-transcendence. While others were busily preparing for a conditioned life in the world, I was ceaselessly going beyond it.

I still recall the various forms and flavors of intense spiritual raptures and samadhi (transcendental awakenings) that I experienced in my third year of undergraduate study. The pinnacle of these raptures culminated in the state of nirvikalpa samadhi around March or April of 1980. This state was characterized by total absorption in Pure Consciousness during meditation. In meditation, I exited out of a portal through the top of my head, going beyond the body/mind completely, existing in a state of Absolute Nothingness. During this time, I also experienced other forms of exquisite and exalted transcendental realizations in my active and meditative life, as well as during sleep. In sleep, which was witnessed in the Self, I tasted intoxicating, ambrosial nectars flowing from my heart to my brain in a cosmic circle.

In the winter of 1996-1997 (the actual date remains vague), I was sitting in an ordinary motel room in Palm Springs, California. On this day, meditation went into unfathomable depths, penetrating into and beyond the very core of existence. My thoughts evaporated and my head went from a spherical, physiological casing to an ocean of Divine Light within "seconds” — an ocean still and deeply active. This Light shone from the inside, outside and from the beyond itself. "I" and "the world" dissolved forever into this immensity of warmly translucent, incandescent Light-Oneness. Soon I began to feel the palpable manifestation of the Primordial Energy of the universe, the Shakti. It was brilliant, active, sparking. The Shakti had simultaneously been born in the Being of Pure Light. How strange, though, that "I" could "fit into," and "as," this Immensity.

I was, without question, That, and in the most profound sense, That alone. I had come home. Sharing this Radiant Energy and Divine Light became a natural capability: a radiation without circumference, effort or knowledge. A spiritual magnificence, a superabundance of Being and Transmission of Radiant Awakening, that which has been written about in every religious scripture, was born within that ultimate meditation.

Primordial Bliss was now free to enjoy Its own spontaneous play in the world."

~ David Spero, October 24, 2003, Palm Springs, CA.

I Am Free, I Am Free, I Am Free

I’m gonna talk to my friend...

- Paul Selig,
I Am the Word

I was curious and tried miracles and spirit channeling but I wouldn't bet my life on either today.

“The love we have for you cannot be extinguished by any action you could ever take, by any thought you could ever think, by any belief you could hold against yourself or another. The love we have for you is as present now as it can ever be, and the realization of being loved, allowing yourself to be loved, will be this teaching for each of you who has come to learn what you are.

The aspect of you who knows who he is, the Divine as what you are, knows full well his relationship to Source. The eternity in you is in response to all eternity, and the love in you knows herself in love and not separate from love itself. But the aspects of you who exist in dense frequency and align to things that agree to separation struggle sometimes with the possibility that you can be loved, or know yourself in love, or be with yourself in such a way that you may equate as loving.

Being in love, as we have said prior, is being in the frequency, in the vibratory agreement with the octave of love, which is an eternal frequency that is always present. But the aspects of you that reject the self, would harm the self, refuse the self his worth, will shun the light that comes to him, will hide from the light that would call him out because of his belief, her belief, that she cannot be seen, cannot be known, cannot be agreed to as one who may know love.

This is not a remedial teaching in the least. This is the cause of most of your pain, and the misalignment you hold, each human being, to what you are as one who is not only worthy but already is loved is what must be reckoned with tonight. The teaching we bring to you is also for the man before you in request to his petitions for his own well being, and as we teach him we teach each of you who is in reckoning with the self that would deny his own ability, her own worthiness of love.

Now that light that you are, as we have said, is already in agreement to this, but there are aspects of each of you that have been denounced in some ways. And what has been denounced or rejected must be reclaimed in order for it to receive the love that it requires. Now love is not only acceptance — but you can’t quite comprehend that, so we must give you another example — love is not only acceptance, but surrender to those aspects of you that have been denounced, and in surrender acceptance lies.

Now surrender for some of you is a great riddle. “I can’t force myself,” you may say, “to a state of surrender.” But you can accept the potential that you have to rely on a small self to solve all your problems, and you can comprehend that the small self of itself has not done much but make matters worse. So here we go, friends. In the agreement we make with you now to be as you are inclusive of all aspects of the self that have been rejected, we agree to you as what you are, the holy name you have, the one who may know love because he cannot be without it. And the residual echo of this claim will serve you for your lifetime as you align to this intention. We are claiming this for you each now in resonance and echo, which means vibration, and the echo of the vibration that may be claimed by you as the life you live.

Now the Divine Self is the one who will say these words with us, not the aspect of you who believes she cannot, that he is not allowed. But the one who sings with us is the one who knows who he is and will make this claim for an eternity because, as you understand, the True Self exists in eternity although she may know herself now. Here we go, friends.

We sing this song for each of you here, for the man before you, for those who will hear these words or read this testament someday down the road. We sing this song for each of you so you may be remembered and re-decided upon by the full self in coherence — coherence and agreement — with the truth of your being.

“On this night I claim that each one present may know himself, may know herself, as what she is and may abide in a higher agreement of frequency in knowing she is loved, in knowing he is loved. And in the alignment of love, the aspects of the self that have been scattered, torn away, hidden in shadow, refused and unloved, will be gathered perfectly to a new light that we will claim as you. And in your agreement to these words, in this announcement of being, we reside with you as the Divine Self in love for one purpose — to know what you are.”

Say this with us, and say this as the True Self, and speak the words aloud:

“On this night I choose to be received, and each aspect of myself throughout time that has been pushed away, hidden, or rejected, may now be gathered in order to be loved. And as he is received, as she is received, in fullness, the being that I am may be known in residual knowing that there has never been a time, never a moment, never a possibility that I have not been loved. As I say these words, I surrender to the Divine that is present as now as where I am as it may ever be. I know who I am in truth. I know what I am in truth. I know how I serve in truth. I am free. I am free. I am free.”

Feel this, yes, and be as you are, just as you are, as the one who may know and be and sing, “I am here.”

Now when we tell you this we don’t dissuade you from the choices you have before you, but we do invite you to decide tonight that the being that you are in his perfect way, in her perfect way, may know that she is loved, that he is loved in infinity, which is always and ever.

And as this love is infinite, there is no beginning to it and no possible end, so you cannot be subjected to anything, anything at all, no circumstance is possible that can deny you the love that is ever present as you in this agreement:

“I have come to sing. I have come to know. I have come to hold my head above the clouds to see the truth in all mankind, in all humankind. I have come to be the one who knows, who agrees to the truth of being. And as I say yes to this, I am sung, I am the song in embodiment of new life, of new truth that may be reasoned, comprehended, and known by all mankind.”

Some of you say, “But I cannot be this thing you say.” But my friends you are, you are, you are. You have always been, and you can only be the song of truth when you know who you are — the song of being, “I am here”; the song of receiving, “I am agreeing”; the song of freedom that enlists the universe in its support of its claim, “I am free”; the being that you are who has come to be known once again as what you have always been and is loved because you cannot not be.

Now when we teach, we teach in degrees. For those of you who come in sorrow, we may show you joy. For those of you who come in joy, we may teach you reason. When those of you who come as a gift to be received by those of us who serve you, we untie the ribbon that you are covering yourselves with so you may be seen and gifted to your world.

The beings that you are, you see, are the emissaries of truth. You are not the expert on truth. You don’t have a degree in truth. You are not here to tell people what to do, how to act, or what to believe. But you are here to sing to them as the true vibration, the true being who has come in service. What your song is, you see, is your frequency, your vibratory accord. And to be sung simply means that you have become the tuning fork in vibration of the Divine Self that will bear witness to the being of all she sees in the higher agreement of what may only be known as God or truth or being in light. The Source of all good is the Source of all, and the discriminating you do here in the lower vibration is removed to clear vision, to clear sight, to claim in unity that which has been rejected, has been put aside, has been called out in anger or shunned by the world.

The least of you, you see, are as loved as those of you who would demand the attention of the world. No human being, like it or not, is higher than the one beside him no matter what they do that you would disapprove of. But many of you come to learn the hard way, and you make it quite difficult for yourselves to receive the love that is indeed your inheritance.

What we would offer you now as we say yes to the world before you is that the song you sing as the one who knows she is worthy, he is worthy of love, so it may be known by all, must be claimed anew each day for you to sing to the world you see. Here is this teaching:

“Each day I rise and give permission to my being to be in service to the Source of all good, and as I agree to be in service I allow myself to be sung, and as the song that I am in emanation surrounds me, I agree to encounter all I see as this vibration.”
The song is sung in such a simple way that it may confound you, so you may use these words if you require words to say “I am”:
“I know who I am in truth. I bear witness to a world in truth. And as I give myself over to be in service, the song of God is sung as and through me. I am here. I am here. I am here.”

Now this is done by you in agreement, in surrender if you wish, and the aspects of you that you would put aside — “Well, this is not the holy me, and that part of me is rubbish and cannot be seen or known by anyone” — as you sing, you are collected and you rejoice as an entire being. And those things, those pieces of you, those shards of broken glass where you see a bad reflection of what you believe yourselves to be, are made new as you are made whole in the agreement to the truth of your being.

Yes, the True Self is whole, has always been whole, and the mockery of the small self to the True Self has been the cause of this fragmentation. We say these words now for those of you who are attending to us, perhaps for the first time. The reason for this teaching is the alignment and ascension, embodiment and incarnation of your true natures. And to judge aspects of yourselves as unworthy of God makes them unworthy of love, and to deny God because of your own unworthiness is to claim a prison in the face of freedom.

We usher you each now forward, if you would. We are seeing lines of you preparing yourselves for the good work ahead. And the being that you are in service, in rejoicing, in agreement to be as the song embodied, calls the world forth in a much different way than the small self can comprehend now.

As we complete this lecture, we wish to teach you a few things about comprehension and acquiescence. You may comprehend anything through the intellect — “I see what is required of me in this situation, I understand my name, I comprehend its meaning” — but to be in comprehension as an alignment, to comprehend, to be as with the subject of inquiry, to be what you are in this agreement, is to comprehend truth without regard to acquiescence of history.

And by history we mean what you were taught to perceive.
“I comprehend the man in the road. I know the man in the road in my comprehension of him. My realization and knowing in comprehension of the man in the road bears no association to what I was taught to prescribe to the one I see because every aspect of me is now being informed by his being. And as I comprehend, I may love him as he is because all is loved.”
You really cannot love, you see, without comprehension and agreement, but you can deny yourself love by refusing to be comprehended.

What we wish to do now, if you will give us permission, is to hold you all in love. And we will comprehend you as you may allow us, and all you ask to be is what you are in this moment, this being that you are, to be in reception and in comprehension of love. On the count of three, we will claim each of you in the love that is always present as we are and as you are in your truth. One. Two. Three. Be received by us as you are as loved, as you are in truth, as you are in freedom. As you are and as we see you, we comprehend you, we realize you, we know you, we know what you are and can only be in knowing, in being, in awareness of the being that you have always been.

Now we say these words in agreement to you. The being that you are will be arranging, aligning, and assuming you so you may comprehend what has occurred, so allow us if you wish to continue with you, each of you if you wish beyond this day as we know you in the eternal self.

We don’t depend on your time to see you in your worth. It is always so.

We will stop now. We will say this to Paul. Please listen to this teaching. You are included in this teaching as a student of the work. We thank you each. We will return in a moment with your questions, on the teaching if you prefer. Period. Period. Period.”

~ Transcript of Paul Selig channeling: “The Purpose of Being,” Part III
From a livestream lecture delivered in New York February 23, 2017.

"Paul Selig is considered to be one of the foremost spiritual channels working today. In his breakthrough works of channeled literature, I Am the Word, The Book of Love and Creation, The Book of Knowing and Worth and The Book of Mastery, author and medium Paul Selig has recorded an extraordinary program for personal and planetary evolution as humankind awakens to its own divine nature.

Paul was born in New York City and received his master’s degree from Yale. A spiritual experience in 1987 left him clairvoyant. As a way to gain a context for what he was beginning to experience he studied a form of energy healing and began to “hear” for his clients. Described as “a medium for the living,” Paul has the unique ability to step-into and “become” the people his clients ask about, often taking on their personalities and physical characteristics as he “hears” them telepathically.

Paul offers channeled workshops internationally. He serves on the faculty of The Omega Institute, The Kripalu Center and the Esalen Institute. Also a noted playwright and educator, he served on the faculty of NYU for over 25 years. He directed the MFA in Creative Writing Program at Goddard College for many years, and he now serves on the college’s Board of Trustees. He lives in New York City where he maintains a private practice as an intuitive and conducts frequent live-stream seminars."